Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
For some people, giving a right for the students to choose what to study is a worthy practice to maximize their knowledge and experience. In contrast, shaving track for the students can be more effective because it helps them to focus on the most practical lessons. In my view, there is no absolute answer to which way is better because each one has different benefit and the students need to balance between both styles for several reasons.
To begin with, typical children have more enthusiastic to learn about their favorite areas than the subjects that they have no interest in. The more willing to learn, the better results of studying, because the students will pay more attention to the class that is interesting. For instance, one of my friend in university, who never appeared in the physics class, was always the first person who submitted the computer class assignments. Thus, the youths should determine their preference to learn because it will bring out the highest capacity that they could perform.
However, adult, who has more experience about the career and life, should act as a coach to manage young people to receive the most fruitful knowledge and get ready for the real world. As an adolescent, the student may cannot figure out the professional life as much as the grown-up person can. It is the teacher’s responsibility to guide the student what to learn, even though there are some tough subjects that are quite hard for an average person to understand.
In conclusion, because there are different advantages in both ways of learning, the university students should attain both aspects so that they can get the most out of their valuable time in the university.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications 66
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?“In twenty year there will be fewer cars in use than there are today”Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 86
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'in my view', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201257861635 0.247107183377 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.138364779874 0.155533422707 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0849056603774 0.0946595960268 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534591194969 0.0501214627716 107% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0408805031447 0.0437548338989 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.119496855346 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.00943396226415 0.0403226058552 23% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.61882288492 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0503144654088 0.0326793684256 154% => OK
Particles: 0.0062893081761 0.00163938923432 384% => OK
Determiners: 0.119496855346 0.0861772015684 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0345911949686 0.021408717616 162% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0251572327044 0.011925033212 211% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1701.0 1933.35771543 88% => OK
No of words: 285.0 316.048096192 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96842105263 6.12580529183 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354385964912 0.374742101984 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.256140350877 0.28420135186 90% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182456140351 0.203846283523 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101754385965 0.137316102897 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61882288492 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.037074148 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.56093040696 100% => OK
Word variations: 58.123910728 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0891783567 68% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9090909091 20.7743622355 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.225772175 49.517814964 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.636363636 127.492653851 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7743622355 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 51.5231259968 49.1944974215 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.41891891892 1.69124875643 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324231989365 0.332605444948 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127347360033 0.102741220458 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0441785062521 0.0668466124924 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.668078552885 0.534860350844 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119814841379 0.148594505496 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154243174118 0.134430193775 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467733594073 0.0742795772207 63% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.345550717738 0.324371583561 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0979216008598 0.0638462369009 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22106066391 0.228012699653 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168379998303 0.058150111329 29% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.68436873747 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.