Some people think that the best idea to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell do you agree or disagree Include any relevant example based on your knowledge and experience

Essay topics:

Some people think that the best idea to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell.do you agree or disagree ? Include any relevant example based on your knowledge and experience

The ultimate goal of modern entrepreneurs is to bring out maximum profit from their employees and businesses organization's. In this contemporary epoch, majority of masses assert that, conferring remuneration to personnel on the basis of outcome is anticipated to be a worthwhile idea to stimulate the workforce to toiling hard in working sector. Here I would like to accord with the given statement firmly.

An abundance of points can be considered to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, giving wages to staff according to produced result is a lucrative approach to enhance the productivity of employees. To epitome, workforce is supposed to toil hard to increase productivity at workplace which enables them to earn skyrocketing salaries. Moreover, this trend ignite the spirit of competition among staff to show their efficiency in work if they paid on the basis of their outcomes. Consequently, the idea of paying according to productivity act like a spirit boosting tonic for personnal.

Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially,as it is well said that money is not god but not less than god so money leading cause than other factors which stimulate the working staff to do hard to expand the productivity.no matter how many hardship are to be faced by employees but they do their work with full of dedication in order to earn more and more which enables them to lead an aristocratic lifestyle. Needless to say that, paying salaries according to productivity and selling could be a fruitful approach to motivate employees in order to maximize the profit of an enterprise.

To recapitulate, one requires to be friendly ambience, bundle of amenities to stimulate personnal toward work hard. However, the idea of motivating employees to paying remuneration on the basis of work performance seems to be out of box.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-05-01 Jiyuu 61 view
2021-09-06 jasu 73 view
2021-09-06 jasu 73 view
2018-08-22 Justin 72 view
Essays by user jasu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...spirit boosting tonic for personnal. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 51, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...phasizing on my point of view. Initially,as it is well said that money is not god b...
^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hardship seems to be countable; consider using: 'many hardships'.
Suggestion: many hardships
...o expand the productivity.no matter how many hardship are to be faced by employees but they ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...matter how many hardship are to be faced by employees but they do their work with...
^^
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich enables them to lead an aristocratic lifestyle. Needless to say that, paying ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14666666667 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09547339765 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.2561305066 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.769230769 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138114243896 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437739082622 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361897669932 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861677175194 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289883745263 0.056905535591 51% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.