Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extend do you agree/disagree?
Nowadays, many people belive that the most efficient way to solve problems of the environment is to raise the costs of fuel. I completely disagree with this one-sided approach as in practise it would lead to an increase in living expenses.
On the one side, hiking prices of fuel could cause not only transportation costs to go up, but also expenses associated with the utility bills. As a result costs of products, namely food, clothes and other necessities would club up. For example, a recent study conducted at University of Keele showed that raise of fuel price by 10% leads to an increase in core household bills by 17%. Therefore, despite possibly reducing the impact of fuel pollution on the environment, raising its price would negatively affect all citizens, mostly the poorest.
On the other side, saving the environment requires more effort than increasing fuel costs. Although it could encourage people to opt for public transport more often, it would unlikely be enough to decrease overall pollution, as environmental problems stem from more than car fuel and CO2 emission. According to the report presented at the G8 summit in 2019, fuel associated pollution accounts for 17% of overall environmental damage and this number has been consistently falling in the last decade. Therefore, increasing the price of fuel would not make enough of a positive impact. Although the air quality could improve in the most polluted area, it would not solve the global environmental problems.
In conclusion, I strongly belive that increase in prices of fuel is not the best way to save the environment, as it would hit the working families the hardest, spiking costs of necessities like food.
- Task 2 Studies show that criminals get low level of education Some people believe that the best way to reduce the crime is educating people in prison so they can get a job after leaving prison To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Cloning 78
- Since most information about culture and history can be found on the internet museums are not needed anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Studying abroad pris and cons 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table below shows the salaries of the anthropologist in work five years Summaries the information be selecting and reporting th 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10394265233 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79141294479 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569892473118 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6779770165 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244272889945 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951443560575 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596182991098 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169148272884 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460512402546 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.