Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, extreme weather events appear more and more frequently so dealing with global environmental problems is now considered a critical issue. Some people think that increasing the fuel price is the most effective way to cope with this problem. I strongly agree with this statement for several reasons.
In fact, the main cause of global warming or air pollution is the emission produced by factories and individuals. To be specific, hundred tons of fuels are being used per a day all over the world by numerous industries in various fields, especially in agriculture. Furthermore, the number of people using personal cars is increasing due to the affordable price of gasoline . As a result, a huge amount of toxic emission is released into the atmosphere everyday. After all, it not only spoils the air but also destroys the natural habitat. Hence, not only can increasing the cost of fuel save fuel, it also protects the environment.
On other hand, when people do not want to spend a lot of money on fuel, they could find some alternative environment friendly methods. For example, people can walk to work instead of using cars or motorbikes. Therefore, they could improve their health and save the air at the same time. Besides, some prospective sources of energy could be used to alter fuels, for instance, solar power, wind power, electric,...In fact, green energy has been used for a long time. So that if the fuel cost is increased, renewable energy could be prioritized.
In conclusion, I believe that increasing the cost of fuel is the most effective way to deal with global environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to help us at home and at work Is this a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...tories and individuals. To be specific, hundred tons of fuels are being used per a day ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... due to the affordable price of gasoline . As a result, a huge amount of toxic emi...
^^
Line 2, column 452, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...mission is released into the atmosphere everyday. After all, it not only spoils the air ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...tance, solar power, wind power, electric,...In fact, green energy has been used fo...
^^
Line 3, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...e, solar power, wind power, electric,...In fact, green energy has been used for a ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, after all, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96336996337 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79014777561 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1925267988 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264842140013 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863259852668 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909553328492 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172663818869 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061292825983 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.