Some people think that charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country. But others believe that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Indubitably, volunteering organisations are an impactful form of blessings to the needy and the poor. However there are predominantly two contrasting views where one section of society vehemently deems that these NGOs must be patriotic in nature whereas the other section vociferously argues that help should be offered wherever the need arises.
Apparently, there is a proportion of society which prefers the countrymen a significant priority which can be substantiated by myriad supporting arguments. Chiefly, this is because of scarcity of funds and financial assistance and tends to allocate those funds on the poorer sections of their native land. Not only owing to lack of resources but also because of certain patriotism and nationalism that is enrooted deep into their hearts make them indignated towards the masses of other countries. To vindicate, Khalsa Aid; a sikh volunteer institution group; offers hands to the accepting survivors of their religion and country.
Although there exists a society of former view yet the contrary section accords with the latter notion. Their accordance can be substantiated by various reasons.The establishers of such charity institutions have set them undoubtedly with the motives of social welfare regardless of the boundaries set by the walls of nations. They are believed to be the forerunners of supreme soul, 'God' and must gives service to every corner of the world as per the neccesity.
Despite the presence of two opposing societal opinions, my profound conceit equally supports the dual opposition. I certainly believe that that every institution of charity is distinct and unique in its own nature and varies in amount of resources as well as the innate objectives and must work in accordance to the individual preferences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-07 | maulik beladiya | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-02 | vyhanh | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-16 | harsimrankaur26 | 89 | view |
- some people think that killing animals for food is cruel but others claim that animals are necessary part of diet 89
- Many people think living in high rise apartments makes people feel lonely and unhappy While others argue it has advantages Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places 89
- In many countries there is lot of rubbish because more and more people buy things What are the causes What are its effects 92
- Many people spend a lot of money on clothes haircut and beauty product to enhance their appearance Some people think that it is a good way to spend money while others think there are better ways to spend it Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...of blessings to the needy and the poor. However there are predominantly two contrasting...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...can be substantiated by various reasons.The establishers of such charity institutio...
^^^
Line 7, column 135, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...he dual opposition. I certainly believe that that every institution of charity is distinc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, so, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41218637993 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00714496255 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63082437276 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.875284024 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.272727273 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139434055511 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424219380745 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397117131434 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756918171383 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233674844129 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.31 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.