Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Although it is sometimes thought that schools ought to teach children to compete, other people believe that the focus should be on cooperation. In my opinion, deciding whether to focus on competition or team working skills should depend on the age of the child.
On the one hand, children who learn to compete against each other often do better in school, according to some. In other words, the competition between students motivates them to excel in their studies or tasks which consequently produces better academic performance and results. Furthermore, it is commonly believed that these skills are essential for children to learn in order to succeed later in life when they must compete against others in the job market.
On the other hand, it is often thought that it is better if the emphasis at school is on cooperating with others. People do not live, work or socialise apart from others, so learning how to work alongside others ought to be taught from childhood. Without these skills, many think children would lack the ability to communicate with each other or know how to deal with confrontations and conflicts in a constructive way.
Finally, in my view, both skills are indispensable for a child’s future but the focus should depend on a child’s age. While young children need to learn how to communicate effectively and learn to work with others, older children, who are starting to take exams and be assessed on their academic performance, would benefit more from the competition. Schools, therefore, need to be flexible as to when to focus on one over the other.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe it would be better for young children to develop team working skills and older children to become more competitive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | DHANYA JOSEPH | 83 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. To what extent do you 84
- These days people in some country are living in a “throw-away” society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away. Causes and problems. 78
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 89
- Some people think that children should be taught to be competitive in school. Others, however, say that cooperation and team working skills are more important. Discuss both sides. 67
- The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a constructive way" with adverb for "constructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... deal with confrontations and conflicts in a constructive way. Finally, in my view, both skills are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, in conclusion, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03741496599 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78050146443 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2346041992 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294716951159 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110819206388 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644692816934 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179137388658 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063630675842 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.