Some people think that cities are the best places to live in. Others prefer to live in a rural area. Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the countryside and give your own experience.
The question of which the most ideal place to live in is has become a controversial topic for many years, especially in the context of urbanization today. While some people have a craving for a sustainable job and good accommodation in modern cities, others still enjoy a peaceful life in small towns. In my point of view, each kind of living environment has its own merits making it become the most suitable place for certain groups of people, and also demerits that people have to deal with.
On the one hand, people who choose to live with the hustle and bustle of cities argue that cities bring a lot of benefits for them, especially job opportunities and a proper education system. Having advancements in technology, modern infrastructure as well as great investment from Government, urban areas are home to a great number of companies and international corporations thereby providing a multitude of employment opportunities with high salaries and promotion prospects. Besides, big cities are also places where most prestigious schools and universities with high-quality facilities and well- trained teachers and professors are located. Thus, only by living in such places do students have chances to develop both professional knowledge and essential skills, especially foreign language skills, to become global citizens in this era. However, life in crowded cities is not easy for everyone when citizens are facing some urgent problems. The more people moving to urban areas to live and work or study are, the more serious the traffic congestion is thereby becoming an obsession with every citizen. Also, because of the remarkable increase in the amount of exhausted fume from means of transportation and factories in such places, air pollution is at an alarming rate.
On the other hand, some people think that the best place to live is in the rural areas. It is believed that people who live in these areas have a healthier life because they breathe fresher air, they eat more hygienic and natural fruits and vegetables and they live in a more relaxed and quiet environment. As a result, their life expectancy is longer than those who live in cities. Moreover, the family and social bonds in villages are more close-knit than those in big cities. Thus, people feel happier because they can talk and share their problems with other people easily. Despite its positive sides, living in remote areas has certain disadvantages. It is the low- quality education system that is a big drawback of living in such areas. Moreover, in comparison with cities, the health-care system in small villages is still backward.
In conclusion, living in the city or the countryside has its own positive and negative sides, and it depends on the preference of each individual. I personally choose to live in the city area to enhance my career and plan to live in the countryside when I retire
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Manideep Macherla | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | aerwtrw | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | hoaithuongnguyen | 73 | view |
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Inte 89
- Consumers are facing an increasing number of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think advertisements influence consumers What measures can be taken to protect them 89
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers Employers organizations say that in the global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent What are your views 84
- As well as making money businesses should also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both vie 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2408.0 1615.20841683 149% => OK
No of words: 478.0 315.596192385 151% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03765690377 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7903715185 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512552301255 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 774.9 506.74238477 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4884391408 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397056874913 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130268954008 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113665809559 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268217645591 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0954421166822 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.