Some people think that the development of technology helps to reduce crime, while other people think it encourages crime. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In the past century, our kind has made huge technological advancements. Those advancements broadened our views on the universe, and changed our lives profoundly. Technology improved our standard of living and made a lot of our time more comfortable. Specifically, I think it discourages crime rates in the world. However, there are arguments on how it might actually encourage crime.
The most important thing which defines the modern era is information. Many engineers and scientists are working to achieve a faster and more effective way of transferring that information. Nowadays, information is mostly transferred between computers and servers. A type of information that every person on Earth needs to use is money. In the past, money was always represented by a physical thing, precious metal or a piece of paper. In modern time, most of that money has become digital, it is safely stored in computers of our banks. This presents a big problem for common thieves, who make their living robbing peoples’ houses or robbing people on the streets. It is not effective anymore, because people do not carry much cash in their wallets anymore. Most of their money is being used through credit cards, which need extra security information to be exploited. Also, there are also more and more surveillance systems. Cameras are placed through cities and in buildings, as well as alarms, in order to prevent outlaw activity.
Another problem for criminals is the fact that if someone has a criminal record, it could be easily accessed by authorities. For example, if a person with a criminal record is trying to smuggle drugs across the border of two countries, he will be checked by border police. When they check him and discover it’s past criminal activity, they will probably search the person’s stuff, and most likely will find the illegal substance.
While technology brings new tools for dealing with the crime, they can be bypassed by smart individuals. The information era brings in a whole new virtual world. Furthermore, this created a whole new, usually malicious, profession - a hacker. However, for one to become a successful hacker, one needs to be very intelligent and educated in the field. Some of them possess skills to break through even the most sophisticated security systems and do great harm to the victim.
To sum it up, I think technology is discouraging crime more than it is encouraging it. Although hackers present a great danger to the modern system, I think people who are intellectually adept for such activities understand the consequences, are educated and have better alternatives than criminal work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | stefan ielts | 84 | view |
- Restrictions On Ownerships Of Mobile Phones 67
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified graduates without employment.What factors may have caused this situation and what, in your opinion, can/should be done about it? 56
- People nowadays are used to disposable items meaning that they use things for short time and throw them away. What do you think is the cause of this and what problems can it lead to? 84
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 84
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...licious, profession - a hacker. However, for one to become a successful hacker, o...
^^
Line 13, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ystems and do great harm to the victim. To sum it up, I think technology is disc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 430.0 315.596192385 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19534883721 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93391301251 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579069767442 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7007615983 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9230769231 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140354595852 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0384828110841 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637003277991 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856665379806 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688651851784 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.