some people think that the earth is flat. others think that earth is round. Discuss both these views and give your opinion
Believing in a particular shape of the earth is a complex issue that the humankind has been trying to perceive it. In the past, many cultures believed that the earth is flat due to thier scriptures, however, there were a few number of people believe in contrast of that,but they were like ostracized in their community. Nowadays, majority of people believe that the earth is round due to many reasons such as technology and contemporary machines, unlike a few of people who believe in opposite of that. In this essay I will explain simply both opinions by evidences as follow.
The team who believes in the round earth has plenty of evidences as artificial satellites, curved horizon, rotation between the night and the day, a lot of journeys that navigate around the earth and prove its roundness and myriad of evidences that I can’t number. In addition, majority of astronomers complete their search depending on the round earth's theory as well as tell the people that the earth is disapprovingly round. A very strong evidence is the existence of astronomy agencies such as NASA which confirm the round earth’s theory. After all these evidences you will ask,what does the round earth’s theory mean? This theory means that the earth is as a tiny ball moves around it self as well as revolves around the sun, and the sun moves around the center of the galaxy in the meanwhile. Also the galaxy revoves around the center of the universe! This is the unimaginable round earth’s theory in a simple way.
Despite all these evidences above, there are increasing numbers of people who disapprove round earth’s theory and attack the space agencies and accuse them of lying. All the evidences they have are concentrated on refuting the other theory. For instance, they deny all explanations of gravity that comes from astronomers who believe in the round earth despite they haven’t any explanation of gravity. As a matter of fact they criticize the other theory well by real evidences and refute it persuasively, because there are many defects in the other theory. The audience of flat earth follow smart tactics by using visible evidences such as observation, doing experiments and using the defects of the opponent's theory just to convince the people that the round earth’s theory is definitely wrong in spite of their theory's correction.
In brief, no one nowadays can prove neither round earth’s theory or flat earth's theory unless they come with persuasive and irrefutable evidences to end up this confusion.
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from friends can harm or damage the relationship. Do you agree? Why or why not. 56
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using internet. 11
- some people prefer live with system. others prefer to live randomly with out laws. Discuss the both sides and give your opinion. 84
- It is sometimes said that borrowing money from friends can harm or damage the relationship . Do you agree ? why or why not . 56
- some people think that the teenage years are the happiest times of most people`s lives. others think that adult life brings more happiness, in spite of greater responsibilities. Discuss both these views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...thier scriptures, however, there were a few number of people believe in contrast of that,b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...er of people believe in contrast of that,but they were like ostracized in their comm...
^^^^
Line 1, column 567, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...plain simply both opinions by evidences as follow. The team who believes in the round e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...ete their search depending on the round earths theory as well as tell the people that ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , what
.... After all these evidences you will ask,what does the round earth's theory mean...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 703, Rule ID: IT_SELF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'itself'?
Suggestion: itself
...he earth is as a tiny ball moves around it self as well as revolves around the sun, and...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... center of the galaxy in the meanwhile. Also the galaxy revoves around the center of...
^^^^
Line 3, column 925, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... unimaginable round earth's theory in a simple way. Despite all these evidences above, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...m of lying. All the evidences they have are concentrated on refuting the other theo...
^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther theory. For instance, they deny all explanations of gravity that comes from ...
^^
Line 5, column 711, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...xperiments and using the defects of the opponents theory just to convince the people that...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, after all, for instance, in addition, in brief, in contrast, such as, as a matter of fact, as well as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2133.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 421.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06650831354 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76102494136 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477434679335 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.615770862 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.3125 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3125 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265185072837 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107941005911 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451213273802 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175861311164 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023994520615 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.