Nowadays, majority of people often argue that the job giver should pay attention towards the quality of work, rather than the employees dress. While I agree with the statement that workforces should be given the freedom to choose the way they want to dress. I belive that existence of uniform comprises of multiple advantages in certain professions.
On the one hand, most of the modern employers focus on the staff's explicit performance, rather than their clothing in workplace. Moreover, this enhances the workers tendency to cope up with heavy workload. I see this as a positive trend. For instance, successfully established companies like Google, Facebook, and Microsoft dosen't force their employees to maintain uniform and thus, creating a friendly working environment. According to their performance and global dominance of these companies, it can be understood that dress code for the staff is irrelavant to their capacity of producing quality work.
On the other hand, I can explain the use of dress codes in some work contexts. Employees who wear their company's uniform can be a source of marketing. This is because when staff step out from their company, people will notice their logo and might be impressed, which eventually, leads them to buy an item. This helps customers to distinguish a company from other entities. Furthermore, dress code can bring up team spirit among an individual to work effectively as a team. To illustrate, Lux company's staff plays a prominent role in their product marketing, by wearing a uniform symbolizing their brand as trustworthy and enhancing their sales. This automatically leads to fruitful results.
In conclusion, staff should be judged based on their capabilities, rather than their uniform. On the other hand, having staff to wear uniforms is a strategical way to promote their company's product and helps customers distinguish their employees.
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 74
- The bar charts below show the Marriage and Divorce Statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994 Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Write at least 150 words 73
- Some children nowadays take sports seriously while others play sports in their free time Is this a positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples 84
- The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010 73
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live Others prefer to live in a rural area Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the countryside Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... work, rather than the employees dress. While I agree with the statement that workfor...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: PRP_RB_NO_VB[1]
Message: Are you missing a verb?
...to choose the way they want to dress. I belive that existence of uniform comprises of multi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 294, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...ess. I belive that existence of uniform comprises of multiple advantages in certain professi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
... workplace. Moreover, this enhances the workers tendency to cope up with heavy workload...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29139072848 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87241683511 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579470198675 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.2233183113 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270374244001 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840144556093 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608230317144 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175086962502 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00433114375247 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.