Some people think environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, think that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, there have been several controversies about environmental problems are increasing. While some people argue that global issues can not be solved by an individual, others think that it is possible to make a change. In my personal view, I am of the belief that only if individuals take some actions could environmental contamination be effectively alleviated.
On the one hand, it is reasonable for some to consider that this problem is too big for human beings to resolve. First of all, fighting against such natural disasters as floods, earthquakes, and tsunamis may be beyond the ability of average people. To illustrate, global warming, which causes lots of the disasters mentioned above, is an obvious phenomenon happening across the globe. Hence, all of us are witnessing its effects on our daily lives. This might be explained by the fact that people need more resources and food for their lives with the increase in the global population. In order to expand the living areas, people tend to destroy the flora of several areas, especially in the forests. Consequently, the weather has severely changed in many decades and the temperature is always increasing, leading to many tragedies, such as wildfires, hurricanes, rises in sea levels, and diseases, which take a long time for humans to deal with the consequences. Additionally, there are even disasters that people have yet to find a way to solve as thoroughly as before, like the COVID-19 pandemic that killed million of people.
However, others assert that unless humans take some action, environmental contamination could become a chronic issue. And there are lots of measures we might probably adopt. First and foremost, governments could introduce laws to limit carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming and respiratory diseases. In other words, they might impose "green taxes" on drivers, airline alliances, and so on, combined with investing in renewable energy production from solar, wind, or water power.On an individual level, we should try to change our daily habits by banning plastics and using environmentally friendly transport, such as bicycles and public vehicles, or planting trees to reduce global warming. Followed by the above solutions is the modification of the state supervision of the well-being of our environment.
In summary, although the battle against natural disasters and large-scale man-caused dangers may seem like an impossible task for individuals, efforts and attempts are still an integral part of the aim to create a better living environment by adopting some small steps. All of these strategies can secure the survival of the Earth. I believe that if we all work together to protect our planet, we will be able to achieve it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1112, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... like the COVID-19 pandemic that killed million of people. However, others assert t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pandemic that killed million of people. However, others assert that unless human...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...uction from solar, wind, or water power.On an individual level, we should try to c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, in summary, such as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 443.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27539503386 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99573452552 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 176.041082164 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613995485327 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.4892917244 49.4020404114 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6111111111 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249605453782 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684339830247 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778474057076 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156060275754 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1041234312 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.