In many countries, traditional food is being replaced by international fast foods. This is having a negative effect on both families and societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many nations, with globalization and international trade facilities, it is undeniable that the rise of fast food has been a significant issue in civilization and has replaced traditional ones virtually. From my perspective, I agree that the increase in junk food is not only detrimental to families but also to both individuals and societies. However, I also believe that this adaptation has bought some benefits to humans.
On the one hand, there are a variety of reasons why fast food consumption presents a lot of drawbacks. First of all, junk food can have an adverse impact on people's health. Some dishes, like pizzas, fried chickens, or sandwiches, contain too much fat, saturated carbohydrates, and calories. Consequently, this may cause several diseases, like obesity, type 2 diabetes, and so on. To illustrate, according to the Ministry of Health of Vietnam, 20% of the Vietnamese people are overweight and the main reason is junk food and calorie drinks such as Coca-Cola and Pepsi. Additionally, the rise in consumption of fast food has also impacted family relationships. Sitting around a table, the family enjoys a meal. It strengthens relationships. A happy dinner is also a chance for all members to share with one another and relieve stress after a long day at work. These benefits are not seen when children and adults just sit in front of the TV and eat from fast food packets held in their hands. As a result, it cannot entice all family members to return to their meal in order to preserve family memories.
On the other hand, I consider that eating fast food, such as hamburgers or fish and chips, has its own set of benefits. First and foremost, it is true that eating junk food items helps you manage a schedule more effectively and saves time. Individuals rarely have a flexible time to eat their lunch or dinner, which requires full nutrition, hygienic, and organic due to their busy lifestyle. In fact, there are a plethora of fast food stores and kiosks like Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC), or McDonald's, in the corners of the streets, subway stations, and malls in several metropolises around the world. Therefore, eating junk food is one option to fill people's stomachs and to get some satisfaction from the hunger, and hence manage different plans without going hungry in the process. Furthermore, this stuff offers a complete meal at an affordable price. Quick-service restaurants always have a low cost compared to lunch and dinner in restaurants and hotels because they do not need to spend much time and materials making them. For instance, if a person buys a hamburger filled with minced meat, lettuce, tomatoes, and so on in commercial stores such as Burger King, he or she only needs to pay $3 to purchase this meal. By contrast, in the local or fine-dining restaurants, the price is higher, about $6 with the same filling.
In summary, despite the noteworthy positive aspects of eating fast food, the drawbacks of this phenomenon are enormous and need to be looked at. As in modern society, each individual should be aware of the problems caused by junk food to minimize its effects on their own lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Burger King, he or she only needs to pay to purchase this meal. By contrast, in t...
^^
Line 5, column 1301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... restaurants, the price is higher, about with the same filling. In summary, de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, for instance, in fact, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2617.0 1615.20841683 162% => OK
No of words: 528.0 315.596192385 167% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95643939394 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.20363070211 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84734057348 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 176.041082164 170% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 808.2 506.74238477 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 16.0 4.76152304609 336% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0939486559 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.68 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.12 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281030585782 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696471449517 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556502873672 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1819416339 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420285506123 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.