Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Environmental issues such as global warming and water contamination have been humanity's chief objectives in recent decades. Therefore, what humans should do to ease these situations has been a topic of public interest. While a number of people are adamant that environmental problems should be curbed worldwide, others assume that solving them on a national scale is a better option. In this answer, I will look at the reasoning of both camps and explaining why I side with the former.
It is understandable why a host of people advocate towards the latter is largely justifiable. The key rationale is that much less and effort for mitigation as well as propagating citizens to protect the nature would be required. However, this notion is flawed since govern bodies of a single nation are not able to make a critical impact on the overall environment status. The Save The Earth campaign in Vietnam perfectly exemplifies this situation. Solely one year after being established by the officials, this program had to shut down in light of the fact that it was not able to sway the mass. This is a testament to the futility of national policies being posed.
Instead of the aforementioned approach, I am of the opinion that the incorporation of citizens around the globe is essential. Given the fact that a myriad of natural disasters occur around the world annually due to climatic shifts, the economic productivity of the world is adversely affected. Therefore, every nation is responsible for shielding the environment on a universal level through its action. Only people take part in this mission together, would they realize how rapid the habitat being improved.
In conclusion, while there may be many justifications for the latter, I firmly believe that international action should no doubt be given precedence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-12 | Neham514 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | bangtaenie_77 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | AlexLy | 92 | view |
| 2021-06-15 | manvinder rai | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-10 | noahumar | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that robots will play an important role in future societies while others argue that robots might have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12416107383 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95656628141 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630872483221 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6127600125 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234397571495 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661411735145 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947096873137 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132600281754 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0882886579889 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.