Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

The power to influence of celebrities now a days is huge thanks to the aid of social media and many others. Therefore, some people think that these individuals can attract attention of the public to international aid organizations’ s problems. Meanwhile, others are of the belief that they can make those issues lost their important nature. While both of these views are valid, I believe with proper methods, the benefits of celebrities can be astronomical.

Illustrious individuals guide can guide people’s attention to IAO. Indeed, inherently, they have a lot of influence over a wide range of people. They, therefore, are at great positions to increase people’s awareness of international issues. In the past, there have been many examples of celebrities contributing to public interests by fund raising and had gain triumphant success. This can also be applied to the discussing problems. Not only they can touch the public, they can also encourage other acclaimed individuals to join hands. If this happens, it will create a huge shift in society views and awareness on those imperative issues.

Contradictory, many believe famous people can make important problems seem less serious which can be detrimental. To some extent, this argument is valid. This can be attributed to the fact that entertainers tend to be associated with comical contents, therefore, misguide their followers to treat such problems as non-detrimental. There have been a few instances of celebrities who has been criticized by the public for using inappropriate manner to convey a serious issue. Although their intents were positive their ways of deliver were not suitable.

In conclusion, I personally believe with attentions to their attitude, messages, and other seemingly minute details, celebrities can contribute significantly to our endeavor to solve international problems.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-02 hongngocvo 67 view
2023-03-02 hongngocvo 64 view
2021-01-17 Samathanary 89 view
2021-01-03 doanhzoompro 61 view
2021-01-03 bihungba1101 73 view
Essays by user bihungba1101 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: nowadays
The power to influence of celebrities now a days is huge thanks to the aid of social med...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...e power to influence of celebrities now a days is huge thanks to the aid of social med...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...riate manner to convey a serious issue. Although their intents were positive their ways ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49826989619 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16966727394 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57785467128 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3122132297 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4705882353 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.94117647059 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373667825833 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111486213923 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108382856945 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225345311835 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724664896354 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.