Some people think that genetically modified (GM) crops are a positive development. Others, however, argue that they are potentially dangerous. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about the progress of genetically modified agricultural products. While some people believe GM crops are beneficial, as far as I am concerned, the modified products may have adverse outcomes.
On the one hand, genetic engineering of food products have some advantages. Firstly, the modified crops become resistant to pests and fungi. This would result in no deficit in crops in terms of diseases. Secondly, the crops would be bigger in size, better in taste and shiner in color. In addition, they would be highly durable.
On the other hand, these changes have negative consequences. Changing the genes of crops would be harmful, since these are new scientific experimental methods and up to now there has not been any sufficient evidence to support GM crops beneficial effects for long term. Furthermore, these changes not only threat human life, but also plants and wildlife are in danger, too.
To put it in nutshell, genetic engineering progress is a global concern and despite the beneficial effects of that, I believe it would be harmful for our life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-24 | foadihasan | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | nexuse | 56 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | tanthao123456 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | asmita acharya | 73 | view |
- Some people think that genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give your own op 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: bigger
... diseases. Secondly, the crops would be bigger in size, better in taste and shiner in color. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 1615.20841683 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 178.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1404494382 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73731595252 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.634831460674 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1426532141 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1818181818 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206409745829 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778930655279 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417803839585 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116921950532 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063202129348 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.