Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages?
There is a common belief that good health is of great importance to everyone and therefore profit-making companies are not supposed to run medical services. Although some people may claim that private health care may be too expensive to the public, I would support that it may have copious positives.
Private healthcare can be of great benefit to patients’ efficiency boost. If the medical services are operated by private corporations, there would be affluent ones emerging and competing with each other in order to make profits. Under this stiff competition, these private hospitals may put all their efforts to improve themselves in every aspect, especially trying to solve the problem of a long queue of patients waiting for their treatments. Consequently, patients in private hospitals can see their doctors quickly.
Another advantage is that the doctors in the private hospitals are more responsible for their patients. Compared with the doctors in the public hospitals, the counterparts in the private ones normally receive far fewer patients, which makes it possible for them to regularly collect the feedback from their patients and to give more useful advice about the patients’ rehabilitation.
Naturally, a few opponents may argue that the private healthcare tends to be more expensive than the public one, allowing the rich to be treated and the poverty-stricken not to. This difference may be the main reason why the poor cannot keep healthy. However, the government can effectively address this problem by rendering financial aids to the impoverished patients who are in desperate need of cash.
In conclusion, according to what has been discussed above, my firm conviction is that private healthcare has more advantages than disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | tvda1711 | 61 | view |
| 2019-01-24 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Frank Chen | 11 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people argue that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports. But other people think the success is much related to the mental attitude. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Should old buildings be destroyed and replaced with modern ones? 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt that it may have copious positives. Private healthcare can be of great benef...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out the patients' rehabilitation. Naturally, a few opponents may argue tha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ents who are in desperate need of cash. In conclusion, according to what has bee...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42753623188 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04658226806 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590579710145 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0578812127 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.833333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2112138162 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796238982581 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725242281382 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116659223557 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975026026713 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.