Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people strongly believe that it is not necessary to use public money for art and cultural, while some people argue that the government ought to invest money in cultural activities because of their merits for human life and the cultural. In this essay I will discuss two views on this issue.
On the one hand, there are several reasons the government should invest money in art and cultural. Firstly, it would keep them engaged. The second benefit of this action is that it will strengthen the bonds between people. Moreover, it can be a beneficial thing for preserving cultural diversity. The government will be able to earn money from the sale of museum tickets or other cultural activities. Furthermore, it would be an excellent way to attract teenagers and tourists. In this generation, the children always staying at home and play games. By taking part in activities outside, they can escape the internet for a while.
On the other hand, a huge amount is required for the uplift of cultural services and consumes a lot of the country's revenue. Firstly, a portion of the budget is spent on addressing environmental problems. Secondly, civic facilities can be improved if an adequate amount is available to the rulers. Moreover, progress in the field of art has only an abstract value and does not generate any financial benefit. Therefore, it's better to invest in other sectors like power generation, import and export, education and food supply.
In conclusion, although countless people believe that governmental organizations should not invest financial help in culture and art, I still hold that the value of culture and art brings advantages to human life.
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 73
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... I will discuss two views on this issue. On the one hand, there are several reaso...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey can escape the internet for a while. On the other hand, a huge amount is requ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t and export, education and food supply. In conclusion, although countless people...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09747292419 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75745639975 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57761732852 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.7232500249 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312663153291 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920206435934 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0900207518194 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186906771437 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515312624462 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.