Some people think that the government has the duty to ensure its citizens have a healthy diet, while others argue it is the responsibility of each individual. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
some people argue that the authority must responsible for inhabitants to have a healthy diet. I disagree with this view because i believe that person has the duty to ensure their healthy diet.
For a variety of seasons, it would be wrong to government give a hand to ensure its individuals have a healthy diet. Firstly, it would be difficult to decide about how much money will be pay for healthy diet. Secondly, it will bring a great waste of money for a nation, especially a country where is developing. In addition it is still need a large number of money to purchase in another factor such as economics, education,... Finally, it is not necessary because there are an extensive number of aspects that authority need to consider
In my opinion, we should personal eating habits and physical conditions from each other, which cannot be universally standardized and compulsory required by governments. It is due to the fact that if authority set up a healthy diet for citizens, people must follow that rule without their own choices. On the other hand, individual diet habit critically influence life quality. Firstly, inhabitants must acknowledge how healthy diet play an important role. Not only for themselves, but also for the society. It is due to the fact that if one individual have a good health, a community will have a wealth life.
To conclude, I do not believe authority will performance to control a healthy diet for citizens. Whereas inhabitants is the one and only who can control their healthy diet by their own.
- Air pollutants in UK 78
- Advertising encourages consumers to buy in quantity rather than promoting quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tonnes, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 73
- 1: The information below gives details about household income and spendingon food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
some people argue that the authority must re...
^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...diet. I disagree with this view because i believe that person has the duty to ens...
^
Line 2, column 315, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ially a country where is developing. In addition it is still need a large number of mone...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
... is developing. In addition it is still need a large number of money to purchase in ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 341, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eveloping. In addition it is still need a large number of money to purchase in another factor suc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ther factor such as economics, education,... Finally, it is not necessary because ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, whereas, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87356321839 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80063786782 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2847194492 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8571428571 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239038601655 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886484542541 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843534006296 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165639758379 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955423440302 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.