Some people think that the government should give money to creative people, such as artists and musicians.
To what extent do you agree?
Over the last few decades, since the technological revolution, art became an increasingly controversial topic. Some people think that the government is the one who should financially support creative people while others believe the opposite
First of all, it is known that the culture is what defines a nation. there are many cities, such as Paris and Rome, around the world which became famous due to artworks and monuments. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people around the city and act as landmarks for visitors and tourists. The government should be the one who financially helps artist in order to produce these kind of artworks because without them cities would be less interactive and attractive.
On the other hand, there are numerous countries which struggle with more significant issues. For example, state budget has to be equally shared to public services like healthcare and education system. This facilities are crucial in a country’s development. Global warming and pollution, over the last decades, has become a more serious issues that many countries are trying to solve before it’s too late. countries like China and Thailand have major problems regarding the air pollution.
Another argument against government funding for art is that artists do a job like any other professional and so they can easily earn their own money by selling their work. The lack of funds can give them motivation to create more artwork, make brighter performances. There are many creative people who became remarkable artist only because of financial struggle.
In conclusion, I agree that government should give money to creative people but only on the condition that there are no urgent issues that must be solved in the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-25 | sharanbhullar | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
over the last few decades, since the technol...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople while others believe the opposite First of all, it is known that the cultu...
^^^
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...t the culture is what defines a nation. there are many cities, such as Paris and Rome...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...e famous due to artworks and monuments. these artworks represent culture, heritage an...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...epresent culture, heritage and history. they serve to educate people around the city...
^^^^
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...cially helps artist in order to produce these kind of artworks because without them cities...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be less interactive and attractive. On the other hand, there are numerous co...
^^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...s like healthcare and education system. This facilities are crucial in a country&apo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Countries
...ing to solve before it's too late. countries like China and Thailand have major prob...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... problems regarding the air pollution. Another argument against government fund...
^^^
Line 4, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...re artwork, make brighter performances. there are many creative people who became rem...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st only because of financial struggle. In conclusion, I agree that government s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28070175439 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71241914265 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2395909118 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223117057875 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602613068667 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830163687986 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135094713773 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084881367071 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.