Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things.
It is undisputed that arts and cultures symbolize the beauty and the values of a nation. Presently, some people opine that spending money in the promotion of arts and cultural programmes should be the priority of the government. On the contrary, others reckon that administration of the nation investing money on significant fields will be lucrative. Here, I would like account for both views with my own perceptions.
There are manifold points to endorse the former view. First and the foremost, investing money on cultural events is the need to show the essence of cultures and religions. To demonstrate, nowadays, people are fascinating towards affluent cultures and adopting the style of living, eating and wearing that are followed by the people of western countries. Moreover, people are becoming busy at their works and do not manifest their intrigue towards traditions. Therefore, cultural events is relevant to foster people to preserve their own values. In addition, art competition held by the government will be fruitful to encourage art work exhibition representing historic moments, monuments et.cetera. Consequently, people can aroused for the promotion of their own cultures and values. By contrast, others have conflicting views.
They think that the problem of unemployment, poverty, education and air pollution is thriving and reaching to the top of table. As an evidence of this, about 60% people of Nepalese societies are still illiterate due to the lack of schools. So that, government should focus on these areas for the betterment of people. What is more, government should pay attention towards the development of tourism and trade sector to boost the economy of a country.
To recapitulate, undeniably, cultures and arts represents the dignity of the country. But, it is clear that, presently, problems above mentioned are the main issue which should be addressed by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-04 | binita karki | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | binita karki | 78 | view |
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web. 56
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
- Advertisement brings many negative effect on people and the society. What are these problem? How to solve this problems? 73
- Governments Should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 27
- Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled Discuss both views 43
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, as for, in addition, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37209302326 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93720402263 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574750830565 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6071426296 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8333333333 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344558515029 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844305410431 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590068552035 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176391280398 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485779114985 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.