Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Each person has a different sensibility for any particular thing. Same in this matter, certain people believe, that investing in arts is the misuse of the government money instead there are various possessions, those are important rather than crafts. Besides many of appreciating government for working in artistry. I admit that devote to arts is constructive for the attraction of the world it helps to increase the economy indirectly but besides I never denied that some investment on artistic things just ruined the money. Whatever fact, this essay will elaborate in below sections.

Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people of country show interest on it like art galleries and paintings, movies etc. In a few countries, sports are more appealing then arts, Instance people like to follow cricketers, which has more followers than sculpture.

To begins with opposed, the world's population increased rapidly but jobs are limited, so mainly unemployment the biggest thread in the current world, in this situation the government should create more opportunity for workless people rather than funding amounts on the artworks.

Now turn to the educational department, as we know that most of the students are studying in government schools and they are far behind then private ones because of new technical or modern studies not appear in the government schools. In this circumstances, the regime should work.

After that Health system, which country can grow without the health of the civilisation? another big problem those are needful to change and improve.
The government should pay more for health departments because there are many regions where people have not to access the proper medication from the government hospitals.

To conclude, making country beautiful is not regretful but to meet the needs of countries peoples is a vast act. Investment on art would only benefit in a small minority but for enhancing the capability of human is larger and the government should think for the country people, not a sculpture.

.

Each person has a different sensibility for any particular thing. Same in this matter, certain people believe, that investing in arts is the misuse of the government money instead there are various possessions, those are important rather than crafts. Besides many of appreciating government for working in artistry. I admit that devote to arts is constructive for the attraction of the world it helps to increase the economy indirectly but besides I never denied that some investment on artistic things just ruined the money. Whatever fact, this essay will elaborate in below sections.

Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people of country show interest on it like art galleries and paintings, movies etc. In a few countries, sports are more appealing then arts, Instance people like to follow cricketers, which has more followers than sculpture.

.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'interpolates'.
Suggestion: interpolates
...borate in below sections. Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'interpolates'.
Suggestion: interpolates
...borate in below sections. Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ew countries, sports are more appealing then arts, Instance people like to follow cr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ulpture. To begins with opposed, the worlds population increased rapidly but jobs a...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ot appear in the government schools. In this circumstances, the regime should work. ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...without the health of the civilisation? another big problem those are needful to change...
^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...the country people, not a sculpture. . Each person has a different sens...
^
Line 20, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'interpolates'.
Suggestion: interpolates
...borate in below sections. Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 12, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'interpolates'.
Suggestion: interpolates
...borate in below sections. Government interpolate the money on arts worthy if the people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 20, column 186, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ew countries, sports are more appealing then arts, Instance people like to follow cr...
^^^^
Line 24, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s more followers than sculpture. . ...
^
Line 32, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...than sculpture. .
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 466.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45064377682 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80296275215 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.416309012876 0.561755894193 74% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 751.5 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3123712328 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 7.06120827912 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 12.0 5.01903807615 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225101579004 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0725709297557 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061358663379 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10245651464 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552864872146 0.056905535591 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.