HIGH SALARY TO PARTICULAR PERSON BY THE GOVERNMENT IS METTER OF DISCUSSION THESE DAYS. A PART OF SOCIETY ADVOCATES HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH IT WHILE OTHERS CONDEMN IT. IN SOME CASES, I AGREE TO ADAPT THIS SYSTEM BECAUSE NO ONE CAN PAY EXTRA TO SOMEONE WITHOUT ANY LOGIC. THIS ESSAY WILL SCRUTINIZE THE MERITS AND DEMERITS WITH EXAMPLE AND OPTIMUM CONCLUSION.
TO COMMENCE, USUALLY, REGIME IS PAYING HIGH INCOME TO THOSE PEOPLE, WHO ARE MASTER IN THEIR FIELD. FOR EXAMPLE POLITICIANS, SCIENTISTS, SURGEONS, SPORTSMANS. HENCE THESE GROUPS ARE RECEIVING HIGH COST BECAUSE ADMINISTRATION WANT TO INCREASE THEIR INTEREST FOR THEIR HARD JOBS. SECONDLY, THESE PEOPLE ARE TAKING IT AS A REWARDS AND AWARDS ARE PLAYING MAJOR ROLE FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCES THEY BECOME LOYAL FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
HOWEVER, THE MAJORITY OF SOCIETY DENY THIS SYSTEM IN MANY ASPECTS BECAUSE ACCORDING TO THEM, A HUGE PAYMENT TO PARTICULAR GROUP IS NOT GOOD IN ANY SENSE. ALTHOUGH THERE IS HUGE NUMBER, WHO ARE WORKING TOUGH BUT GETTING LOW WAGES AND IN THIS CRITERIA GOVERNMENT HAVE TO CONTROL THE LEVEL OF SALARY TO FEW PEOPLE. FOR INSTANCE , ARMY OFFICERS ARE DOING MOST HARD WORK FOR THEIR COUNTRY AND SACRIFICING THEIR COMFORT FOR OTHERS BUT GETTING LIMITED SALARY AS COMPARE TO CELEBRITIES.
TO CONCLUDE, BOTH POINTS ARE RIGHT IN THEIR SENSE. BUT WORKING FOR COUNTRIES DIGNITY, HAS MORE SCOPE TO PRETEND THEIR NATION TO GLOBALLY IS A ARROGANTLY JOB AND ANY PERSON CAN NOT DO THIS WORK PERHAPS THE MAJOR REASON FOR GETTING HIGH WAGES.
- Some people think that the government wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 56
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education. 61
- People increasingly spend their leusure time using computers, for example, surfing the Internet or playing computer games. This has brought benefits but has also created new problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- Some people say that the most important thing for being rich is people have opportunity for helping other person ? Do you agree or disagree? 87
- In some countries fast food restaurant and companies give money to school provided that the schools promote their school children products to school children What do you think is the positive and negative in the development of children 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...OPLE, WHO ARE MASTER IN THEIR FIELD. FOR EXAMPLE POLITICIANS, SCIENTISTS, SURGEON...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: HENCE,
...IANS, SCIENTISTS, SURGEONS, SPORTSMANS. HENCE THESE GROUPS ARE RECEIVING HIGH COST BE...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ING MAJOR ROLE FOR GOOD PERFORMANCE. IN THIS CIRCUMSTANCES THEY BECOME LOYAL FOR THE...
^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: Too
...ENT HAVE TO CONTROL THE LEVEL OF SALARY TO FEW PEOPLE. FOR INSTANCE , ARMY OFFICER...
^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...EL OF SALARY TO FEW PEOPLE. FOR INSTANCE , ARMY OFFICERS ARE DOING MOST HARD WORK ...
^^
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...MITED SALARY AS COMPARE TO CELEBRITIES. TO CONCLUDE, BOTH POINTS ARE RIGHT IN TH...
^^^
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('ARROGANTLY') instead an adjective, or a noun ('JOB') instead of another adjective.
... TO PRETEND THEIR NATION TO GLOBALLY IS A ARROGANTLY JOB AND ANY PERSON CAN NOT DO THIS WORK PER...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03557312253 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56095628955 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604743083004 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2319276648 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205890303976 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671489856858 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354400934151 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117830184304 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208192038012 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.