While, some people think that the old buildings must be preserved to keep the texture of the city, I think that the city is a living thing and must reflect the ages that it pasts.
On the one hand, cities we live in are a major part of our culture, which keeps as together and helps us define as a community. It contributes the memory of the society we live in. It helps us to remember our past, some of the buildings are even so iconic, so that many people come and visit the city to see them from all around the world. This also helps us to respect our roots, and build a future which is in a harmony with the old city. A city without those old buildings is like a man without any memories.
On the other hand, everything we build or make has a purpose, and also a lifespan. Although renovation or restoration, can prolong this lifespan, sometimes this can be contradicting with the city's needs. Especially in the last decades, with increased density and population, most of the cities expanded enormously. This uncontrolled boom has also brought its own problems with it. For example, some of those buildings has become an obstacle against this growth, while many of those buildings are inconvenient to live, not suitable for energy saving, or too old, others are unsafe or threatens other’s lives. Moreover they can cause traffic congestion and pollution.
To conclude, we should keep old buildings to preserve our collective memories and history, whereas this does not necessarily mean that we should stand against modern architecture and cities.
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The water use in 2000 by six countries in the Middle East 51
- The table below shows the consumer durables (telephone, refrigerator, etc.) owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve in. It helps us to remember our past, some of the buildings are even so iconic...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... in. It helps us to remember our past, some of the buildings are even so iconic, so that m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and also a lifespan. Although renovation or restoration, can prolong this lifespa...
^^
Line 5, column 615, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...unsafe or threatens other's lives. Moreover they can cause traffic congestion and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns other's lives. Moreover they can cause traffic congestion and pollution. ...
^^
Line 5, column 674, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cause traffic congestion and pollution. To conclude, we should keep old building...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, as to, even so, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78597785978 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6428702729 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568265682657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2007008841 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7692307692 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174469241594 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602028512491 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629492970219 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126013462743 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073732224284 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.