Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports and activity. Discuss both view and give your opinion
Some individuals believe that hazardous sports should be prohibited by authorities. Whereas, others claim that people are entitiled to the freedom to engage in any sport or activity they adore . Although both schools of thought hold a value of accuracy, I endorse the view that individuals’ legal participation in dangerous sports or activities should not have any boundary
On the one hand, many people advocate for dangerous sports to be banned since participants may face potential consequences of losing their lives or damaging their health. Dangerous sports often require fully developed techniques as well as intensive training to perform successfully. Nonetheless, many players posibbily fail to acknowledge the risk and have a poor preparation, which leads to the possibility of fatal or permanent health subsequences. As a result, hazardous activities such as bungee, skydiver, or rugby are suggested to be prohibited as they can threaten people’s live
On the other hand, some individuals still suppose that dangerous sports should still be carried because many people are really passionate in thrilling activities and also these sports have become extremely safe recently. In detail, many nations have established strict regulation to ensure the ultimate safety for their participants as well as remaining the thrilling nature of itself. Therefore, people do have freedom to participate in these activities, therefore, it is illegal for authorities to ban these dangerous sports
To conclude, despite controversial opinions on dangerous sports, I still support the idea that people should be entitiled to play dangerous sports. Despite the fact that this sort of activities can be potentally risky for individuals’ life, it is still legal to let these activities carry on since they are ensured with full safety equipment and training
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below give information about the diet and general health of two groups of students 79
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map shows the development of the village 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...gage in any sport or activity they adore . Although both schools of thought hold a...
^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... activities should not have any boundary On the one hand, many people advocate fo...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uthorities to ban these dangerous sports To conclude, despite controversial opini...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... with full safety equipment and training
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nonetheless, really, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, sort of, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57950530035 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05061083116 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 100.045298382 49.4020404114 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 175.444444444 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4444444444 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7777777778 7.06120827912 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358666311553 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152673754192 0.084324248473 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105484990912 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233107056023 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106125083418 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.09 50.2224549098 46% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.