The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901

Essay topics:

The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901.

The table reveals the changes in the number of two distinct groups of workers in gender and manufacturers in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901.

In general, whereas the number of employees showed a downward trend over the given period, the figure for factories grew significantly at the same time. In addition, the quantity of male employees remained almost higher than that of female ones, with the exception of 1861 figures.

At the beginning, the number of male worker stood at 207, 100, which was nearly double than that of female workers. Further more, 477, 100 employees were recorded in 1851, with a subsequent plummet of 705, 32 workers by the following ten year period. This was due to a dramatic drop in the quantity of male workers from 207, 100 (in 1851) to 131, 700 (in 1861) and the figure for female ones also witnessed a slightly decrease of 30, 000 at the same time, which was exceeded the former. Following that, the 40-year period from 101 to 1901 witnessed a gradual decline in the total number of employees to finish at 61, 000. In particular, the number of male and female workers decreased significantly to the similar extents, at 31, 000 and 30, 000 in respectively.

Otherwise, it is obvious that the number of factories started at 225, jumping to 600 over 50-year period, which was threefold than its initial figure.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-16 nguyenkhangtriem 73 view
2023-08-30 songuyen14 73 view
2023-08-15 trikhung777 84 view
2023-05-27 tuonglinh 84 view
2023-05-19 Chen ni 84 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...almost higher than that of female ones, with the exception of 1861 figures. At the beginning, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...e figure for female ones also witnessed a slightly decrease of 30, 000 at the same time, which was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, in addition, in general, in particular

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78632478632 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55166499152 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534188034188 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3668063916 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230378703108 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102580510689 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835728172355 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156931763119 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900403105932 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.