Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
During the recent decades, art fields are more concerning a spotlight compared to the past, such as painting, theatre and music. As a result, some proportion suggests that the operation of those type activities should not be greatly funded by government but other financial supports can be accepted. Personally, both circumstances have theirs own positives which are clarified in this essay.
Firstly, it is obviously seen that the art activities must be more interesting and active if there is a great investment of enormous money from government. In detail, the majority of artists possess a chance of achieving success in their fields, but the others usually live in poverty, so a fiscal aid may help them a lot. Furthermore, art values particularly becomes a crucial factor in the developing economies in many cities nowadays, leading to an increasing the demand of tremendous attentions and supports from public communities. Consequently, art helps rise sense of enjoyment and brings multiple advantages to the economic growth.
Secondly, focusing a lot on art may cost much the budget of government which should be rationally allocated for other social problems. To explain, the artist can get incomes from selling products and working as tutor or freelancer. Moreover, without funding of government, they can also generate money from other sponsors. In short, these artists are capable of gaining financial support in a number of ways.
Conclusion, I believe that art should not only rely on government for sponsoring but alternative resources should be suggested.
- An increasing amount of advertisements on television aim at children. What are the effects of TV advertising? should it be controlled? 56
- Hi 11
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in short, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95841088748 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66935483871 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2145805507 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.083333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260942364673 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868511165892 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869360693282 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170778348682 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680034616583 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.