Some people think that governments should give financial support
to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe
that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In this technical era, many areas, including art, and music are lagging behind due to a lack of resources and its diminishing value among the masses. In this context, the school of thought that some creative careers such as painters and musicians should not be endorsed financially by the government bodies is opposed by others in the favor of cultural and economic values. This essay would endeavor to shed some light on both aspects, followed by my personal opinion.
To begin with, it is an irrefutable fact that art and music play a pivotal role in bringing ahead the country's cultural and historical heritage at global levels, as a result, stimulating the tourism industry. Also, it helps to keep our old values alive among the youngsters, who otherwise can easily get swayed away due to the rising impact of international art and music. For instance, with the emerging trends in other areas, people are exposed to a myriad of entertainment platforms that deviate them away from traditional art forms. Hence, a subsidized program from the government authorities will keep on encouraging such upcoming talents.
By contrast, another section of society believes that alternative bodies should be accountable for the same cause. Despite the country's global competition, the government has to look after the internal structure that includes an improved healthcare system, upgraded educational system, management of public properties, etc. For example, many developing nations are still grappling with the impoverished conditions of people. So, other companies should come forward to mitigate this burden from the government's bucket.
To conclude, although the views on supporting the artists, and musicians at the government level vary largely among the masses, however, in my opinion, the government should regulate some financial support to these groups, which is highly synonymous with the survival of the country's indispensable and rich cultural treasures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012 78
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 84
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed 78
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The Map highlights the changes in the Museum from 1957 to 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...e light on both aspects, followed by my personal opinion. To begin with, it is an irrefutable...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m, management of public properties, etc. For example, many developing nations are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, look, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45424836601 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85462520206 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630718954248 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9055615526 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.083333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217464313399 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726978231815 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823604288801 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131222928085 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624886195945 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.