Farmers are backbone of nation. In spite of growth in technology and global revolution, yet food is the primary necessity of our survival. we do lots of hard work for our bread and butter. Farmer is the one who feeds us when we are hungry. Farmers should get encouragement from government by sanctioning subsidies and providing pesticides and fertilizers at low cost, thus farmers gets benefited. In my opinion Farmers deserve more support from government and companies producing unhealthy foods should banned.
First of all, Investing in agriculture will not give a promising benefit. Agriculture depends on various factors of climate. If the climate in the particular season is not as expected, it produces less or no crop sometimes. This results in no return back from the investment in Agriculture. At this point of time government should provide the necessary support by providing loans at low interest , fertilizers and pesticides with less price. Government should teach their farmers with the latest technologies in agriculture to enhance their crops.
Secondly, Companies producing unhealthy food should banned. People health risks is involved in having unhealthy food. Government should have a regulatory body to monitor the companies producing unhealthy food. A strict rule must impose on companies to manufacture only healthy food under tidy environment.
To conclude, Health is Wealth. Farmers should get subsidies and many other privileges to grow crops .Saving farmers is our responsibility.
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011. 73
- The table below show the data collected by a college bookshop for the month of February 1998. Summarise the indication by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 11
- RE-WRITE: The table below shows the sales at a small restaurant in a downtown business district.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons. 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Percentage of national consumer expenditure by category - 2002 56
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... the primary necessity of our survival. we do lots of hard work for our bread and ...
^^
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...r no crop sometimes. This results in no return back from the investment in Agriculture. At ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...pport by providing loans at low interest , fertilizers and pesticides with less pr...
^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cides with less price. Government should teach their farmers with the latest tech...
^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... and many other privileges to grow crops .Saving farmers is our responsibility.
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Saving
...nd many other privileges to grow crops .Saving farmers is our responsibility.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, first of all, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 233.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50214592275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98376300964 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609442060086 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9554336628 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.2222222222 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9444444444 20.7667163134 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385779348161 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11061439041 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112605072559 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222168358636 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777978650866 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.73 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.