Some people think that governments should spend money on providing faster means of public transport. Other people think there are more priorities for public transport (e.g. costs/environment/safety). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people suggest that the supreme authority had better allocate budget on providing faster means of public transport, while other individuals assume that the government should prioritize some aspects of public transport such as prices, environmental factors and safety. This essay will scrutinize both views of the statement before arriving at a personal perspective.
On the other hand, it is understandable why several people suggest the government spending money on supplying rasher means of public transport. The first reason for this suggestion is enabling people to commute to any destination in a short period and improving traffic status. This will be one of the factors that contribute to the reduction in traffic congestion in rush hour when employees come back home after a long day working at the enterprises. Furthermore, not only prevent people from getting stuck in the congestion, but also help to improve the punctuality of a person which is considered to be one of the components to get promotion far beyond in career path in the future because arriving in time is a fundamental requirement in workplace and also show persistence to the occupation.
On the other hand, many people assume that the government should pay more attention to other aspects of public transport. To begin with, the price of using public transport should be prioritized because most people have a tendency to use services with a reasonable price instead of an excessively high price and an appropriate price also allows everyone from different social classes to use which is able to assist economic growth. Another priorities for the supreme authorities to pay attention is environmental issue on account of its poisonous gas emission which is extremely harmful to humans' well-being and cause some serious ailments including respiratory diseases and lung cancer, so the government should come up with some practical measures to tackle this issue such as looking for an eco-friendly sources of energies or manufacturing more electric vehicles.
In short, although providing faster means of public transport is essential for humans' life, there are other aspects that should be paid attention. Thus the government should combine all sorts of vital factor to provide people with rapider means of transport and alleviate some prevalent problems.
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 73
- The graph below gives information on the numbers of participants for different activities at one social centre in Melbourne Australia for the period 2000 to 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons w 73
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 56
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, well, while, in short, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1973.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34688346883 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89517663069 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.49952019 49.4020404114 214% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 179.363636364 106.682146367 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5454545455 20.7667163134 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370351639897 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159694481926 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121667991754 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251535464117 0.151304729494 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750116771601 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.