Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities (eg cost of living, environment). Discuss both view and give your own opinion.
Many people hold the belief that money should be spent on faster means of public transport. Although this seems beneficial to some people, I side with those who argue that money should be spent on other priorities such as cost of living, environment,.. From my perspective, it is better for the government to choose the second idea.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that providing citizens with faster means of transport would bring a myriad of merits to the masses. Before all else, commuters can save a great deal of time traveling to and from work. As a result, this means that their work productivity will be boosted. Moreover, they are less likely to be packed in cramped, crowded and hot buses. In fact, workers do not need to rush to get to work on time so they have more time to do exercises and enjoy breakfast with family.
Despite having analyzed arguments, spending money on other vital aspects is more important. To commence with, there is one pressing environmental concern. Along with the convenience of faster means of transport, more and more exhaust fumes are discharged into the atmosphere, which makes people become more prone to respiratory diseases and other health issues. Secondly, It is very difficult for people struggling to deal with their basic daily needs to increase the cost of living. Hence, there are many negative effects on the surfer and quality of life and nation’s economies if situations are not tackled.
In summarize, in spite of the increasing the speed of public transport can be a good way to improve, the government should spend money on other priorities first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | longdotrungga | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-15 | Huy Do | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities eg cost of living environment Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities eg cost of living environment Discuss both view and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ties such as cost of living, environment,.. From my perspective, it is better for ...
^^
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ies such as cost of living, environment,.. From my perspective, it is better for t...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... government to choose the second idea. On the one hand, it is irrefutable that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ises and enjoy breakfast with family. Despite having analyzed arguments, spend...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onomies if situations are not tackled. In summarize, in spite of the increasing...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in fact, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90510948905 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64422040302 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5074948973 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297320070906 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977574818123 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1154685503 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211907632722 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124775073937 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.