Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country,
while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
International sporting events have become increasingly common in recent decades. While some
people reckon that host countries might have to deal with a sudden surge in crime or involve
themselves in an exhausting preparation process, more importantly I believe they can take the
opportunity to boost tourism.
To begin with, although events such as these are a great opportunity for countries to gain global
exposure, there are present significant challenges. Firstly, records have shown that there is a
twofold increase in crimes such as prostitution and petty theft when a country organises an event
such as the World Cup or the Olympics. Furthermore, the process of preparing for these events is
often demanding. For the World Cup 2014, it took Brazil five years to revitalise its cities and
construct various facilities including stadiums and indoor athletics arenas to meet the world-class
standard set by FIFA.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that international sporting games can potentially stimulate
the tourism sector. By being the host, a country is able to attract a large array of athletes and their
supporters from all around the world. This sudden increase in visitors will likely proliferate the
sales of products and services such as accommodation and transportation within the period of the
events. In the longer term, it is a great chance for the host nations to promote their culture on a
global stage. For example, since the pictures of beautifully garnished Vietnamese dishes made
headlines during the SEA Games in 2003, Vietnam has been branded as the “Kitchen of the world”
and a must visit destination for global food lovers. This obviously does wonders for the Vietnamese
economy.
In conclusion, although sports events come at the expense of a few immediate problems, the
benefits of boosted gross sales and cultural promotion are of greater significance. In my opinion,
host nations can also consider the option of sharing an event with a neighboring country to spread
the risk and still enjoy the lucrative long term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- In many parts of the world children and teenagers are spending more and more of their time indoors What do you think are the causes of this problem hat measures could best be taken to solve it 61
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 61
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both view and give your opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30149253731 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86615356644 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614925373134 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4379913108 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.857142857 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200744050461 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064297639876 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375160886278 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474050405409 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529048950567 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.