Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Over the last few years, a plethora of cosmopolitan sporting events has been prevalently organized in many countries. Some people suppose that they offer a multitude of indispensable conditions and significant benefits for the hosting country while others have contrary standpoints. The following facts are several reasons supporting my perspective.
First and foremost, it is crucial to recognize that omnipresent sports events like World Cup or Olympics potentially bring a mixed variety of tremendous economic profits for the country. To illustrate this point, a worldwide competition stimulates a large number of tourists and supporters from all over the world which requires the presence of necessary demands, especially accommodation, restaurants, entertainment services not to mention that indigenous souvenirs. It means that the hosting country has considerable income from not only outlandish and domestic corporations’ investment as well as brands' one for these events but also other products' proliferation. Furthermore, hosting an international sports event also assists in an attempt to boost the national reputation and promote conventional culture and custom on a global stage. To elucidate, Japan - the host nation of the 2020 Olympics attracts an incredible amount of attention from international media and makes this become an expedient opportunity with the aim of motivating all aspects to develop together.
On the other hand, there are still considerably insurmountable shortcomings. One point that is worthy of being mentioned is about pollution. According to the reports after closures of events, issues of garbage as well as pollution about air, noise and light occurs more and more that leads to detrimental effects. Additionally, terrorism, riots or hectically cheering crowds are also calamitous hazards that are totally possible to happen.
In the final analysis, the above mentioned facts have created a dilemma when people evaluate the impact of this, and it is still a debatable issue. As far as I am concerned, I put more emphasis on the idea that national governments should have further consideration and enact appropriate policies for the purpose of ensuring that its cons could never overshadow its pros.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...int, a worldwide competition stimulates a large number of tourists and supporters from all over t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 643, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...nds one for these events but also other products proliferation. Furthermore, hosting an ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62536873156 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18014357361 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65191740413 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5819055156 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.214285714 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16870129019 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486040467804 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509543309205 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879908489285 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067961626977 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.