Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion
With the development of the entertainment industry, there are more and more sports games on the international level. Despite many benefits for the host country, some people believe these events lead to more negative outcomes. I will elaborate on both sides and give my opinion in this essay.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that holding a sports event has significant impacts on the economy of the host country. The fans and the public normally search for information about the destination on the internet as well as give reviews about their experience during the sports events. Eventually, the host country usually not only gets credit for holding a remarkable event but also becomes more popular than before. Moreover, after the games, the country can get the chance to be a tourist attraction, which becomes a source of money for the government. In
terms of the economy, hospitality, and tourism benefit from the influx of sports fans from all
over the world. An event such as the Olympic Games, for example, provides a kind of shop
window for the host nation to advertise its attractions for tourists. Finally, because of the development of tourist business, there are more job opportunities for local residents, which contributes to the wealth of a nation.
However, there are some negative outcomes that need further consideration. First and foremost is the government budget. Obviously, holding a global event costs a huge amount of money. if the government of the host nation provides funding for these events, then it must curb public spending on hospitals, schools and a welfare state to help the poor. Therefore, poor countries and developing countries should not try to be the host country of these events, instead, they need to spend their budget on other important sectors such as public healthcare, education, and social insurance. Another thing that should be considered is environmental pollution. There are many pictures of tons of trash at the stadiums after the games, which is likely a normal phenomenon of these events. With the rapid increase in the tourist industry, the environment will highly be in danger in the future because of irresponsible acts of the visitors.
In conclusion, being a host country for an international sports game not only becomes a source of money for the government but also strengthens the economy. However, governments should also consider their budgets as well as the environmental issues before putting huge efforts into holding these events.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...e hand, it is undeniable that holding a sports event has significant impacts on the ec...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...bal event costs a huge amount of money. if the government of the host nation provi...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f irresponsible acts of the visitors. In conclusion, being a host country for ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, another thing, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81273040408 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514705882353 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 661.5 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0539158305 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220778192314 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627411629523 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582179711691 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10503591342 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510679409612 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.