Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad.
Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Opinion seems divided as to whether it is beneficial for a country to organise a global sporting event. there appear to be strong arguments for both sides, as we shall see.
Advocates would point to the main economic benefits for the host country. Firstly, the sport industry would generate additional income especially from the sale of sports tickets and sports sponsorships. these earnings, relevant experts point out, are considered a financial boost to host cities. Secondly, the local tourism industry could benefit from the spending of foreign tourists. this is evidenced by a massive surge of monied international tourists flocking to a country currently hosting such events as World Cup Finals or olympic Games.
Opponents, however, would contend that the event could place heavy burdens on the host’s shoulders. olympic Games organisers suggest that investments in event-related facilities, including additional sports complexes or transport hubs, would be potentially huge and this could hurt the state budget. Another concern might be a new outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Indeed, if a surging flock of foreign guests were to visit a host country now, leading epidemiologists caution, this might result in dramatic surges in contracted cases, risking local people’s lives and burdening local healthcare systems.
it is, surely, necessary for host nations to factor in these significant risks in this regard. Yet it seems to me that this could do more good than harm, providing event host organisers can guarantee everyone’s safety.
In conclusion, although there seem to be various disadvantages facing different host countries, I believe that these would surely be outweighed by financial advantages so long as organisers effectively deal with issues arising from global sporting competitions
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-26 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | llrasthy J | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | Kiwi | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-14 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-05 | hi.nguyn91 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinion seems divided as to whether it is beneficial for a country to organ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ry to organise a global sporting event. there appear to be strong arguments for both ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...sports tickets and sports sponsorships. these earnings, relevant experts point out, a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... from the spending of foreign tourists. this is evidenced by a massive surge of moni...
^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Olympic
... heavy burdens on the host’s shoulders. olympic Games organisers suggest that investmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...nd burdening local healthcare systems. it is, surely, necessary for host nations ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56317689531 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88837092464 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660649819495 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8856405443 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182133483898 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623018098153 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407650335108 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101849250345 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041954934633 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.