Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent years, one of the topics that receives the most attention is whether being the host of a multicultural sports event may lead to advantages or disadvantages. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and share my preference.

On the one hand, there are many reasons, be it the costs and time usage, to explain why a group of society hold the belief that being the host country is not advantageous. First and foremost, it cannot be denied that covering the costs of a sports event such as infrastructure, facilities, etc. will be challenging for the local authority. Government funding at that time could be invest mostly in this sports holiday which would impact expenses for other purposes, such as domestic public transport. Moreover, it can be a time-consuming activity when not only does the authority have to pay for the costs, but prime individuals of that nation will have responsibility to follow the process of conducting. Therefore, the local residents and their issues may not receive sufficient attention from their government.

On the other hand, I have a strong belief that hosting an international event, especially for sports, has undeniably considerable merits. Through organizing a sports event, a nation can build reputation and promote health among its citizens. In terms of national status, hospitality and tourism in the eyes of international people may soar afterwards. As a result, the relationship among countries can be developed. In addition, sports embrace physical as well as mental abilities. For those who are local sports fans, they can be inspired, and the importance of strength can be reinforced. As health has been considered significant in each person’s life, no naysayer can refuse that value which sports bring to a nation.

In conclusion, because of the occurring globalization, being the host nation can boast a boatload of benefits to their community. Therefore, I believe such a notion can bring positive influences if the government can utilize the value of sports.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-19 qaengx12 78 view
Essays by user qaengx12 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ether being the host of a multicultural sports event may lead to advantages or disadva...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...viewpoints and share my preference. On the one hand, there are many reasons,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... be denied that covering the costs of a sports event such as infrastructure, facilitie...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt attention from their government. On the other hand, I have a strong belie...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...nsiderable merits. Through organizing a sports event, a nation can build reputation an...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lue which sports bring to a nation. In conclusion, because of the occurring ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2012195122 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0629123695 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3855197584 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132982231179 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469966242703 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327447955694 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0814133339933 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458462950612 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.