Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend more time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think students should spend more time on more important subjects. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

These days, opinions are divided on whether those who are attending school should learn the science of food as well as steps to take preparation for it or focus on essential subjects. In this essay, I will discuss both viewpoints and share my own perspective.

On the other hand, there are many reason, be it the educational program and the importance of those compulsory subjects, to explain why a group of society hold the belief that more time should be spent on them. Prominent mandatory subjects such as mathematics, language, etc. have practical applications towards our society’s development. To exemplify, mathematics is considered the principal major in any educational system and is involved in every part of our life, from business, economics, to science research. Moreover, these subjects can assist students to sharpen their mental abilities as they require our brains to be active and put effort into thinking about how to solve a question. Hence, it is understandable why the majority of our time usage should be used to practice these majors.

On the other hand, I have a strong preference that students should be taught about the science of what they eat as well preparation for that at school. In terms of the science of food, it contains a wide range of knowledge, from human biology and nutrition, to organic chemistry. These majors are as well considered crucial in any school’s educational program around the world. In addition, for those students who are on the path of being adults in the near future, learning information related to food is not a waste of time. They will have responsibility to take care of themselves as well as their family. As a result, studying the science of food brings them notions about nutrition and food preparation that serve the purpose of being responsible for their significant ones.

In conclusion, there is no refusal towards significant majors; however, food science takes a vital role in each learner’s personal life as it impacts directly on our health as well as the amount of knowledge to be learnt after are considerable advantageous. Not even such an able individual neglects the significance of the science of what we are eating.

Votes
Average: 4.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-07-19 qaengx12 49 view
Essays by user qaengx12 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oints and share my own perspective. On the other hand, there are many reason...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... On the other hand, there are many reason, be it the educational program and the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be used to practice these majors. On the other hand, I have a strong prefe...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsible for their significant ones. In conclusion, there is no refusal towar...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04098360656 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89948903066 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549180327869 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2686266678 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238389655317 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670293261206 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514625011211 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130998532963 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521436008485 0.056905535591 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.