some people think that huge amount of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view
There is no doubt that wild animal protection is becoming more and more necessary and the government should allocate more money on this. However, some people think that it is waste of time and resources. Instead of spending money on protecting animals, the government should invest that amount of money on other factors that benefit human ourselves. I completely disagree with this view.
It is understandable why some people advocate the view that protecting wild animals is not necessary because they think that it is better to save this money and efforts for the sake of humans’ benefits like allocating money for poverty elimination or education. Although this may be true to a certain extent, it should be bear in mind that no species, even human can survive alone in such an unbalanced ecology. Therefore, protecting animals and environment is also a method to protect ourselves and our next generation.
From my perspective, it has been insufficient resources spend on saving animals, especially in developed countries, where animal conservation is not given adequate consideration. Vietnam perfectly exemplifies the situation. Vietnam’s governments has placed higher priorities on fulfilling people basic needs and put aside the protection of wild animals. As a result investment in this is just modest, causing many species to stand on the brink of extinction and the ecosystem has gone unbalanced. Although it can be argued that there are many sectors which needs investment, I believe that it is worthy to spend money on conserving animals because they play a vital role on the survival, existence, and stability of the environment where human beings are living in.
In conclusion, I believe there should be more time and money spend on the protection of animals because doing this would benefit humans in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school. Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- the graph illustrate wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 73
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017. 73
- scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?? 73
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive. Do you agree or disagree?? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'born', 'borne'?
Suggestion: born; borne
... true to a certain extent, it should be bear in mind that no species, even human can...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93799292214 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554054054054 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1249287498 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361368342521 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128982731065 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859660381788 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241643392885 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799247717652 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.