The diagrams illustrate some proposed changes to the central area of the town of Islip.
It is clear that the principal change to the town will be the construction of a ring road around the centre. Various other developments with regard to shops and housing will accompany the building of this road.
Looking at the map of Islip as it is now, we can see that a main road runs through its centre from east to west. The second map shows the planned pedestrianisation of this road. Traffic will be diverted on to a dual carriageway that will form a ring around the town centre.
Currently there is a row of shops along either side of the main road. However, it appears that the shops along the north side of the new pedestrian street will be demolished to make way for a bus station, shopping centre, car park and new housing area. The shops along the south side of the street will remain, but it seems that the town’s park will be reduced in size so that more new houses can be built within the ring road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-11 | linhnganguyen | 11 | view |
- The diagrams illustrate some proposed changes to the central area of the town of Islip. 11
- the only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offences. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- in some countries, many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development. 78
- the graph below shows wheat exports of three regions between 1985 and 1990 67
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishmentson driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'run'?
Suggestion: run
... it is now, we can see that a main road runs through its centre from east to west. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, second, so, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 754.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.38372093023 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40933487452 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7485029672 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0687238970426 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033575148227 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352990559067 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535749568618 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145382580027 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.12 11.4140731707 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.