Some people think that a huge amount of time and
money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and
that this money could be better spent on the human
population. To what extent do you agree or disagree
with this opinion?
Some people hold the belief that money spent on wildlife preservation should be better taken to other areas to meet the human’s needs. Personally, I completely disagree with this point of view.
On the one hand, although people comprehend the prominent role of wild animals, I do not believe that a large amount of time or money is actually spent on protecting such animals. Charity organizations are believed to be the main contributors to wildlife conservation projects, and people therefore have no right to decide whether or not such voluntary unions should make a generous donation towards. In addition, there is no doubt that not all citizens are willing to devote their time and money to environment-related campaigns since it might be against the law to force them to engage in these activities.
On the other hand, providing national and personal budgets for wildlife conservation is more imperative than ever before for a couple of reasons. On a biological level, it is more likely to disrupt the ecological balance due to the lack of certain animals. Indeed, everything in nature is connected, and if one species becomes extinct, many other animals and even plants will suffer as the food chain is interrupted. From a social perspective, if we exploit or destroy every last square meter of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population, human-induced climate change can bring humanity to a position where we have no choice but to tackle a variety of related problems. For instance, rising temperatures in the decades ahead will lead to major disruptions in agriculture and crops thus won’t grow because of harsh weather conditions.
In conclusion, for the compelling reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that individuals are held accountable and should take steps to preserve and maintain the natural balance of all creatures on the Earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-03 | abid1 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Afdalah Harris | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | mynguyen001 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Linhdung | 73 | view |
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibility To what extent do agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 323, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...eople therefore have no right to decide whether or not such voluntary unions should make a gen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11400651466 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97451749916 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638436482085 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5443386289 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.727272727 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9090909091 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205363764487 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713596906413 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877568219557 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128226315238 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123598719371 0.056905535591 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.