In a number of countries, some people thinks it’s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
These days, there are different views on how money can be spent on transportation in some countries. Some people believe that governments should invest much money on new high-speed railways while others suppose it is better to improve existing public transport.In this essay, I will cover both viewpoints and draw some conclusions.
On the one hand, to some extent, a high-speed rail is believed to have overwhelming advantages. Firstly, this transport system allows people to travel quickly and affordably compared to other public transport. To be specific, by reducing the cost and travel time, workers living far from their workplace will be more able to commute easily and they can visit relatives when they need without purchasing a plane ticket or enduring a long and uncomfortable journey by coach or slow train. Secondly, connecting cities via high-speed railways ensures that safety can be assured. In fact, commuters are not afraid of driving or getting stuck; so the rate of road accidents will be cut down.
On the other hand, some people support the idea that the governments should invest in upgrading existing public transport infrastructure due to a number of reasons. Firstly, the degradation of day-to-day public transport is an alarming issue which large cities have to face. Indeed, old buses pollute the city air with thick exhaust fume and this exacerbates the problems of air pollution in major cities. Secondly, improving available transportation does not require too much financial resources compared to the fast train network. In other words, governments can invest more money on other fields like education or medical care.
All things considered, while it is undeniable that constructing a modern high-speed rail network has its own advantages, enhancing already-existing public transport should be the priority/ is more imperative than ever before.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows information about Heart Attacks by Age and Gender in USA Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words You should spend about 20 minutes 78
- In a number of countries some people thinks it s necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibility To what extent do agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...er to improve existing public transport.In this essay, I will cover both viewpoint...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38983050847 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92483643967 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1154721985 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.307692308 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329476773583 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110056111356 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748233650785 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200861880229 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0910839143959 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.