The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given pie graphs illustrate the comparision of consumption, production of coffee in various nations and profit distibution within four agencies. Units are measured in percentage.
Discussing the first chart, contribution of Japan is 8% with minimum as compared to all other countries. Following them, 12% coffee consumed by the rest of the world. Europe and America have almost simlar value and this is 39% and 41% respectively.
In term of production, South Africa is leading all other provinces by nearly half of total amount with 44%. Exactly the half amount of coffe than South Africa is produced in Indonesia, which is 22%. Further lawer value is 18% in Indonesia and 16% in Vietnam.
Analyzing the profit distribution, more than two quarter of profits goes to the account of Delivery sector with paramount postion in all three graphs (51%). Almost a qurter (24%) of the ptofit is collected by the Retailers. Remaining both sector are in 25%, where just 10% profit earned by the Exporter while surprisingly, only 15% the of the profit left for the producers.
Overall, In coffee consumption, Europe and America are a out performer while South Africa in production, and Delivery sector is a major contributor in profit distribution.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02824858757 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76478496041 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2042753614 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9090909091 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0909090909 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128248040058 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403568462927 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546837684467 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752305291521 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497529505319 0.0819641961636 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.