Some people think that international car free days are ineffective way of reducing air pollution, other think that there are some other ways. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people think that international car free days are ineffective way of reducing air pollution, other think that there are some other ways. Discuss both view and give your opinion.

It is being seen that level of pollution has been increasing over past few decades. While,it is believed by many people that if car free days will be promoted, then heavy amount of air pollution can get reduced, others hold the opposite view, they feel that there are many other methods can apply for reducing pollution. This essay will discuss both sides of arguments and I will present my own prospective.

One predominant reason why people believe that pollution can be get reduced through car free days is, by doing this, air pollution will reduce, infact, noise pollution also reduced. Because cars produce smoke as well as sound . For instance, if cars are banned for one day, then on that day smoke will not created by cars, even noise will not produce. Because of this, pollution will mitigate. Another consideration is owing to ban on cars, traffic will decline. In the other words, if more driving cars are controlled then people may use public transport, due to this pollution can be decreased.

Despite the above consideration, opponents hold their own view, by saying this, only cars are not responsible for creating pollution, there are more things which create pollution. Banning car is not appropriate method to reduce pollution, instead of this taxes should impose on those vehicles, which create too much pollution. In the other words, levyes are imposed according to the amount of pollution, which is produced by vehicles. In this way people may hesitate for driving these kind of vehicles.

In conclusion, although, by controlling on cars pollution may be decreased to some extent and traffic might also decline, yet, I strongly believe that it is not beneficial method for controlling pollution. Pollution can be reduced by using other methods in term of imposing taxes.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-16 jagreet 67 view
Essays by user jagreet :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
... increasing over past few decades. While,it is believed by many people that if car ...
^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ause cars produce smoke as well as sound . For instance, if cars are banned for on...
^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'create'
Suggestion: create
...ne day, then on that day smoke will not created by cars, even noise will not produce. B...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... method to reduce pollution, instead of this taxes should impose on those vehicles, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...his way people may hesitate for driving these kind of vehicles. In conclusion, although...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... for driving these kind of vehicles. In conclusion, although, by controlling on...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06060606061 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61063689181 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2414132918 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215638790746 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734965637896 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053522105373 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141233684023 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285774359323 0.056905535591 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.