While international car-free days are thought to effectively reduce the level of air pollution, some other people believe there are alternatives that are also effective. In my view, those measures are all effective in addressing the problem of air pollution, but only to a certain extent.
On the one hand, it is true that exhaust fumes from cars are majorly responsible for polluting the air as they contain a relatively high proportion of pollutants such as CO2. By having some days without cars on the road, no harmful smoke will be released into the atmosphere, and this will therefore improve air quality. This policy is extremely effective in big cities around the world. Since this car-free policy was strictly enforced, the air quality of the city has greatly improved.
On the other hand, local governments should encourage the use of public transport like subways because it produces a smaller quantity of pollutants and is less likely to damage the air. Also, the disposal of waste, especially plastic waste that emits toxic fumes if burned carelessly, at landfills should be closely monitored. The final and the most effective way is to use sustainable and environmentally friendly energy sources, for example, solar or wind power, to replace fossil fuels in the long term.
In conclusion, it is obvious that the organisation of world car-free days may produce little effect on protecting the atmosphere. Such a problem needs to be dealt with by different approaches and if there is only one way being implemented, it will not be enough.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: eyraen
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17004048583 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0226895258 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647773279352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.785419125 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281653291567 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956812578263 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926770571943 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162759916666 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915966593278 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.