: Some people think international car free-days are an effective way of reducing air pollution. Others think that there are some other ways. Discuss both view and give your own opinions.
There are proposed that having an international car-free day would involve mitigation of air emissions. While people supposed that the other actions are affecting the air pollution issue. From my viewpoint, I would agree that it is a sustainable method for this phenomenon.
On the one hand, having a day on which cars are used is discouraged internationally for contributing to the decline of carbon emissions. Firstly, an enormous means of transport would be diverted from the congested traffic to the tranquil environment within one day. This regulation benefited both developed and developing countries, whose boundless utilization of cars, trucks, and lorries is producing air pollutants. Second, none of the cars in use are likely to be a promising step in the world's handling of global warming, raising global awareness and making an effort to ameliorate air quality.
On the other hand, endeavour actions to upgrade the public transport services is worthwhile to rectify the air emission issues. While public transport fulfills the customer’s demand for high-quality standards, punctual and fast commutes to work will motivate them towards these vehicles. Separating lanes for this purpose is another measure being considered to encourage residents to use environmentally friendly vehicles such as bicycles. Additionally, the government should be ensured to road safety and good security which can be protected bicycles on the street.
In conclusion, global car-free days would be mentioned as a compelling action in mitigating carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, having a sustainable development of the environment could generate happiness in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld involve mitigation of air emissions. While people supposed that the other actions ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64143426295 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11845066147 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5437482145 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147972207947 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571854563473 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609221646043 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988998807102 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0633216603474 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.