Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well. Do you agree or disagree with this statement
It is often discussed by some that sportspeople can behave badly anywhere if they are good enough in their sports performance. However, this essay disagrees with this statement because these people are role models to many.
People who support the act out players may think it is their choice how to behave. Celebrity face in public space always attracts general people to cross their boundaries at any cost. For instance, while interviewing players, media person may ask about sportsmen family problems would irritate him to the core. Similarly, in between the play, participants would express their anger, happiness, fouls in various ways. Therefore, supporters argued that concentrate their achievement in the field rather than their behaviour. Furthermore, it is human nature to misbehave under pressure or failures. For instance, a famous footballer got a yellow card during play due to the bad word he used while playing against opponents.
Nevertheless, most of the sports members have a responsibility to the society as a whole. Youngsters and fans always depend and follows such peoples attitudes, words even their thinking. So, if they would behave poorly it would affect the forthcoming generations like, if they can why can't I? Although breakup the privacy would be irrational, it is the public interest to get more about their life. Therefore, sportsman and women must keep some intelligence, and identity while talking and behaving. In addition, their good character also influence others to become a better person than before too. Good character and behaviour not only stimulate their followers but also themselves.
To sum up, even though, players may performed better in their field, they could not have right to act inadequately in public, ground or elsewhere.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-14 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | sharmaisha | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | sharmaisha | 61 | view |
| 2020-09-16 | Rishiraj Kansara | 89 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | Justin | 84 | view |
- In June 1996, an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only. The result of this survey is presented in the following illustration.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compariso 73
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 76
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 50
- Society would benefit from a complete ban on all forms of advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affect the forthcoming generations like, if they can why cant I? Although breakup...
^^
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ming generations like, if they can why cant I? Although breakup the privacy would b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33687943262 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77563545979 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670212765957 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.9545755173 49.4020404114 36% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.5294117647 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156469720874 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456982738752 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468357096415 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101282093873 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595830522205 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.