Some say that university students should pay the full cost of their studies because higher education only benefits the students and not the society.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people think that it is students' responsibility to pay their full cost of studies at the University because they argued that only students are receiving the advantages of their studies rather than the public. Students often get many profitable things from their higher studies, however, this essay disagrees with the statement because these educated youth are an asset to society.
On the one hand, higher education would have returned to the students in terms of salary, respect, and standard of living throughout their life. Such things are not getting to the public even if they are paid for someone's higher education. For example, sponsored education or scholarships are helps the students to achieve their goals without the financial burden during the study time. However, indeed, educated people are always an investment in society irrespective of their self-income and positions.
Educated youth are the corner stone of each society. People who are honored with higher education are guiding the nation to another level. They can lead, they can divert, and they can manage the public with their knowledge and academic standards. Owing to the fact that, it is truly an unethical to put all the weight to the students shoulder as payments. Regarding the benefits of education, it is the students right to receive the outcome of their studies, inputs and hard work of years. On the other ways, the output of studies would return to society through national developments, social achievements, and the overall well-being of humanity. For instance, higher education may provide good politicians, academic leaders, and scholars to the public.
To sum up, the beneficiaries of higher education are not only the students but also the society, therefore it is a social responsibility to hold a hand to help them.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22184300341 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71728946033 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552901023891 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6927613819 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370257505073 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114513444792 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885683766445 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233586554906 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121167163562 0.056905535591 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.