Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams, e.g. football. However, some people think it is more beneficial to play individual sports, e.g. tennis and swimming. Discuss about views and give your own opinion.

Playing sports game is essential for individuals. While some folks deem that playing in teams are more profitable. Others are contradict with this argument and believe that it is more fruitful when played in individuals. In my opinion, both aspects have their own splendid offerings because of through sports game, people gain prodigious ability and necessary skills.

To commence with, there are several compelling reasons why people should play in teams. Firstly, people acquire interpersonal skills like socializing and cooperating. It is susceptible when they are interact or communicate with other players in a same team. Moreover, playing in team is also essential because of through this, masses may learn the ability of leadership and become responsible person in the society. Furthermore, people have an opportunity to learn prowess due to playing with other members of team who have great experience. To illustrate, in a cricket game, Ms Dhoni a senior player in Indian team has great maturity so due to this, another junior players learn same essential and powerful abilities.

On the other hand, playing individual sports play imperative role for people. This type of sports leads individuals to become great person in the society and also earn massive amounts of honor and respect to others. For example, a badminton player Hima Das, is also achieve awards in Olympic games. So this motives, she gain lots of respect from his country.

To conclude, both aspects play vital role for people because of deriving fruitful and necessary skills at the same time take proud from others in a society.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orts game is essential for individuals. While some folks deem that playing in teams a...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...n teams are more profitable. Others are contradict with this argument and believe that it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'interacted'.
Suggestion: interacted
...rating. It is susceptible when they are interact or communicate with other players in a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'achieved'.
Suggestion: achieved
...e, a badminton player Hima Das, is also achieve awards in Olympic games. So this motive...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lso achieve awards in Olympic games. So this motives, she gain lots of respect from ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gains'.
Suggestion: gains
... in Olympic games. So this motives, she gain lots of respect from his country. To...
^^^^
Line 7, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... lots of respect from his country. To conclude, both aspects play vital role f...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23552123552 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66228465312 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2130363811 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230698550809 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891890297743 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751213502523 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14754685043 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722022650839 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.