Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people claim that engaging in team sports, like football, can reap enormous benefits for the participants. While, others oppose that playing sports individually, like swimming and tennis, is better. Although both schools of thought have their accuracy value,personally, I strongly endorse the former view because it can contribute to the development of the athletes.

On the one hand, some people advocate that playing sports as a team model can help the participants to develop their social skills and communications. Specifically, all the athletes need to practice for a long time together, they will understand each other, especially, they can learn from other partners as a motivation to try harder and harder day by day. As a result, they will know how to collaborate perfectly with remaining members in competitions to bring eye-catching competitions to the stadium. Furthermore, this, in turn, may raise their connectivities, the participants will feel a part of something.

On the other hand, many opinions believe that playing sports individually is better because it is vital for participants to develop problem-solving skills, which are just created during making mistakes when people grow up in daily life. The incidents in competitions and practicing time are unpredictable and avoidable. When participants face these problems regularly, they will know the feasible approach to solve or remedy these. Consequently, they may have more experience dealing with lots of problems in daily life and working places.

To conclude, although both views have separate perspectives, I think that playing team sports is beneficial for the development of social skills and communications while playing individual sports is necessary for problem-solving skills. From my point of view, I still encourage the players to engage in both types to gain the best experience for themselves.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-13 Mayuresh0809 67 view
2023-07-23 minhphambinh1234 78 view
2023-07-23 minhphambinh1234 61 view
2023-07-23 minhphambinh1234 67 view
2023-03-20 TLan168 67 view
Essays by user JENNIE NGUYEN :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , personally
...ols of thought have their accuracy value,personally, I strongly endorse the former view bec...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to the development of the athletes. On the one hand, some people advocate th...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms in daily life and working places. To conclude, although both views have se...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, if, may, so, still, while, i think, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54137931034 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24222476135 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.752561366 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.615384615 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262228344411 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888482628013 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934843649868 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159811520249 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614290302221 0.056905535591 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.