Some people think it is more important for government to spend public money on promoting healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Spending money on different health aspects is a major topic for controversy. Some believe that, distribute money for encouraging the society to enhance their life style and mitigate health problems. Whereas, many others argue that, give money to cure the illness and for the treatment purpose. However, although, every person have the right to get a good care and treatment, I agree with the point that, prevention is better than cure.
Firstly, health problems are the main concern in the modern world. Such as, changing life style, fast food and so on would make a serious issues in nowadays life. So that, government should aware about the health of the society and budget money for conducting health awareness programs. Similarly, nourish the society education related to the healthy life style, and instruct them through the demonstration or case study explanation as well. Secondly, government should increase the tax of junk food or fast food in contrast to the day- to-day needs of the public. Make use of such programs would help the society to concentrate more on echo friendly vegetables or natural products. In my perception, wide range of education system would make a healthy people and health full life style of every individual. All in all, despite the fact that spending money for health awareness is more advantageous rather than the spending money for treatment purposes.
Nevertheless, all human beings have the right to get a good health care facilities either hospitalized or at the home itself.Acquired infection or illness is an inevitable in through out life of every one. Providing adequate and appropriate care is the major responsibility of every individual including the governing system. Increasing hospital buildings and centers has the visual proof of non healthy life style of peoples. Intriguing fact is that, every one is thinking that, such institution would take care of us even after getting illness. This is not a good attitude than take care of our self before getting illness. In addition, to get conscious regarding the food and health care would reduce the expense of treatment to some extent.
In conclusion, I would like to sum up the fact that, government should spend money for prevention or eradication programs than treatment facilities. Flexibility of health programs would have beneficial to the person and community instead of spending money for treatment in later days.
- Some people argue that arts such as music and paintings are a waste of money and the government should spend this money on other public services To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 89
- the chart below shows the result of a survey conducted by the university library to gather the opinions of full time and part time students about its services
- The amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 2016
- Most leaders or directors generally belong to an older age group, but some people believe that young leaders are better.to what extend do you agree or dis agree.give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...d and so on would make a serious issues in nowadays life. So that, government should aware ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Acquired
...ther hospitalized or at the home itself.Acquired infection or illness is an inevitable i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...nfection or illness is an inevitable in through out life of every one. Providing adequate a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2044.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76558850881 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6740933036 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22467424291 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070758631147 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627859456727 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152391139143 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517888745428 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.