universities should accept equal numbers of male and female student in each subject. To what extent do you agree or dis agree?
It is considered by some that, university membership must be equally distributed irrespective of gender for each subjects. However, in this essay agree with the statement because, ascertain education and academic qualification would be a disclaim of every inquisitive student neither male nor female.
Education has been a corner stone of every person. In brief, distributing each subject to students would enhance the quality of education and future well being. Those who are interested to certain subjects would allow to grasp and such knowledge level would lead to betterment of various field. Moreover, each students has different capability to learn and produce good outcome without considering gender. It is a myth of some people such as some sort of jobs or field is not for girls or boys like, fire and safety, hotel management. For instance, equal acceptance of students in university makes up higher qualified personal in numerous field such as, scientific, engineering, medical and so on.
On the other hand, selected gender for university subjects may inhibit the overwhelming growth of development in each section. In other words, segregating some subjects for males and females may mitigate productivity and overall growth of certain fields. For instance, earlier, some universities does not allow boys to go for nursing subject, which produce difficulties in the field of nursing in some extent. Furthermore, differentiating political subjects or humanities for male students may alter the growth and development of a nation in some extent before. Including females in political subjects produce esteemed positioned female leaders in many countries and the result become awesome.
To sum up, dividing university seats for both genders would thrive development and progress as a whole. Maintain academic qualification selectively may diminish achievements in various categories and outcome might be less than the actual which may obtain together.
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- More and more people in the city live in homes with small spaces or no outdoor areas. Do you think it is a negative or positive development? 67
- the chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and repairing the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ion and academic qualification would be a disclaim of every inquisitive student neither ma...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 219, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grasping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: grasping
...erested to certain subjects would allow to grasp and such knowledge level would lead to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c, engineering, medical and so on. On the other hand, selected gender for u...
^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... actual which may obtain together.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for instance, in brief, sort of, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60666666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98372623111 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6869593518 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.133333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213544362737 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072143965037 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454474287026 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11863881184 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598394724131 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.